Rockies 11, Rangers 7 (boxscore)
Winning Players: The Offense
On Friday, the Rockies collected 12 hits and only managed one run. Today, they collected 16 hits and turned that into 11 runs.
That's a much more efficient day at the office, and it helped that all nine spots in the order contributed at least one hit (six had multiple hits, Dexter Fowler was the lone Rockie with three). Also, all nine either scored at least one or drove one in, but no single player had more than two of either.
Excellent balance up and down the lineup card.
Turning Point: 3rd inning, Rockies were leading 1-0 and had the bases loaded with one out. Michael Cuddyer popped up for the second out, leaving us wondering if this was going to be a replay of last night. But Tyler Colvin quickly squashed that, blooping a two-run single into short left field. That was a relief. And then the red hot Chris Nelson followed right up with a two-run single of his own, pushing the advantage to 5-0.
It's a lot more fun to deliver two-out daggers than it is to receive them.
Highlight of the Night: Wil Nieves and Dexter Fowler went back-to-back today at 8-9 in the order. I wonder if that's first for the Rockies?
Josh Outman's Line: 4 2/3 IP, 5 ER, 8 H, 1 BB, 3 K, 1 HR, 92 pitches (60 strikes)
Outman went into the 5th inning with 69 pitches and an 11-1 lead.
Only in the baseball world created by Jim Tracy could that inning be so stressful for the starting pitcher.
Only in the baseball world created by Jim Tracy could that situation turn into as big a mess as it did for the Rockies.
Jim Tracy allowed Outman to go well beyond the new 75-pitch limit for a chance to qualify for the win. I had no problem with it, honestly, because duh, you leave that pitcher in 100 times out of 100 on a normally run baseball team.
But did Outman know going into the inning that Tracy was lifting the pitch count? Probably, but I don't know for sure. And even if he did, he probably wouldn't have known how long his leash was.
Should it have mattered to Outman? Well, it's easy to say no, but what pitcher with a brain and a little pride wouldn't want to see a number other than 0 in the W column. Of course Outman was thinking about it. Of course the Rangers were seeing him for the third time as well. That certainly didn't help, but this fricking pitch count is making the already physically, mentally and emotionally draining game of baseball even more so for our starting pitchers.
That's undeniable, unless our starting pitchers aren't human.
The manager's job is to help alleviate that stress and to take as much thinking out of the game as possible by putting the players in the best possible position (physically, mentally, emotionally). Unless, of course, the manager himself is not human. Which is certainly debatable in our case.
Personally, I don't care if Outman racks up a win. My main concern is the Rockies getting a win (which they thankfully did), but there should not have to be debate or decision about leaving him in past 75 pitches. There also shouldn't have to be debate or decision about removing him at 92 pitches when he'd clearly hit the wall.
But there was, because when will Josh Outman ever have this good a chance to win a game with a 75-pitch limit?
I'll answer that. He won't. Doesn't mean he won't stumble into a win, but under this system this was as close to a layup as he'll get. He just missed the layup because he heard footsteps the whole time.
All of this nonsense is created by the pitch count. It's making all of us so much dumber as baseball fans, because just look at all of the pointless debates it created. It's also making the game so much more difficult than it needs to be on so many levels for the people on the field.
God, I just want to root for a real baseball team again with real leadership and just a smidgen of logic. Is that too much to ask?
Screengrab of the Game
|Today's winning manager.|
Final Thoughts: Rangers fans were booing the home team's performance today. That was a surreal moment and could very well be the high point of the season for the Rockies. I might not be kidding, either.